rolex explorer 216570 too big | rolex 216570 polar rolex explorer 216570 too big After approx 6 months on the waiting list, I bought my polar white 216570 in april 2021. This was the last 216570 they sold at my local AD. I’m so happy with it because the . 1 personal item - Fee free. 1 carry-on item - Fee free. Checked baggage / Hold luggage - Applicable fees per bag increase with number checked. Overweight and Oversize .
0 · rolex explorer ii size chart
1 · rolex explorer ii retail price
2 · rolex explorer ii new price
3 · rolex explorer ii 216570 price
4 · rolex explorer 2 216570 review
5 · rolex 216570 vs 226570
6 · rolex 216570 polar
7 · 216570 rolex review
Alamo Square Historic District. Bounded by Golden Gate Avenue, Divisadero, ster Street and Fell Street. Designated July 1984. The Alamo Square Historic District contains distinguished residential .
I have a 6.7" wrist and do wear a 44mm GS GMT, which is OK but pushing it. I have tried the 42mm Explorer II and it is fine, and I have ordered one (coming any .
beige underground ysl
After approx 6 months on the waiting list, I bought my polar white 216570 in april 2021. This was the last 216570 they sold at my local AD. I’m so happy with it because the . Dimensionally, as mentioned, the Explorer II measures in at 42mm across, which for some is simply too big. But, because the case is relatively slim at 12mm thick, it does wear smaller than you may think. I have a 6.7" wrist and do wear a 44mm GS GMT, which is OK but pushing it. I have tried the 42mm Explorer II and it is fine, and I have ordered one (coming any day/week/month now). Maybe I have just gotten used to larger watches. For you it might be slightly too large, sorry to say.
After approx 6 months on the waiting list, I bought my polar white 216570 in april 2021. This was the last 216570 they sold at my local AD. I’m so happy with it because the older bracelet is much more comfortable. The new clasp is too big and chunky. I know, only 1mm is the diference, but you can feel that. I know 216570 has the ruggedness and that's so attractive to wear daily instead of blingy bracelets. One thing I can suggest is to request the dealer to size the bracelet and let you try the 216570. That'll be the 'right' way to test it out. To me, 216570 is better in every way, except that it is too big. The maxi dial, larger hands, orange 24 hour hand, and improved bracelet and clasp are nice improvements over the 16570. I have a 6.5" wrist and the 216570 is too big for me.
I will admit that 42mm is close to the minimum size I can pull off, but I really think the 216570 is perfectly situated and modest on a large wrist. These images are for the big boys who are doing research on such a watch, how it might fit etc.
Rolex stopped producing the 16570 in 2011. Its successor, which debuted that year and celebrated the 40th anniversary of the Explorer II, got the reference number 216570. With its 42mm Maxi case, it’s just too big for my taste.
Signaling a major turning point for the collection, the then-new ref. 216570 was larger than any other Explorer II watch at 42mm in diameter. Additionally, while the lug width on all previous Explorer II watches was 20mm, the updated Rolex 216570 featured slightly larger 21mm lugs to better match its larger case.
Not too big at all. 19cm is a fairly large wrist, and this size fits you really wellToo big? Just right? Future classic? Due for an update? Thanks for watching guys. Dimensionally, as mentioned, the Explorer II measures in at 42mm across, which for some is simply too big. But, because the case is relatively slim at 12mm thick, it does wear smaller than you may think.
I have a 6.7" wrist and do wear a 44mm GS GMT, which is OK but pushing it. I have tried the 42mm Explorer II and it is fine, and I have ordered one (coming any day/week/month now). Maybe I have just gotten used to larger watches. For you it might be slightly too large, sorry to say. After approx 6 months on the waiting list, I bought my polar white 216570 in april 2021. This was the last 216570 they sold at my local AD. I’m so happy with it because the older bracelet is much more comfortable. The new clasp is too big and chunky. I know, only 1mm is the diference, but you can feel that.
I know 216570 has the ruggedness and that's so attractive to wear daily instead of blingy bracelets. One thing I can suggest is to request the dealer to size the bracelet and let you try the 216570. That'll be the 'right' way to test it out. To me, 216570 is better in every way, except that it is too big. The maxi dial, larger hands, orange 24 hour hand, and improved bracelet and clasp are nice improvements over the 16570. I have a 6.5" wrist and the 216570 is too big for me. I will admit that 42mm is close to the minimum size I can pull off, but I really think the 216570 is perfectly situated and modest on a large wrist. These images are for the big boys who are doing research on such a watch, how it might fit etc. Rolex stopped producing the 16570 in 2011. Its successor, which debuted that year and celebrated the 40th anniversary of the Explorer II, got the reference number 216570. With its 42mm Maxi case, it’s just too big for my taste.
Signaling a major turning point for the collection, the then-new ref. 216570 was larger than any other Explorer II watch at 42mm in diameter. Additionally, while the lug width on all previous Explorer II watches was 20mm, the updated Rolex 216570 featured slightly larger 21mm lugs to better match its larger case.
Not too big at all. 19cm is a fairly large wrist, and this size fits you really well
rolex explorer ii size chart
rolex explorer ii retail price
Jan 10, 2024, 1:38 PM PST. Share. I tested six of the best non-alcoholic whiskeys in a blind taste test to find the smoothest and most convincing whiskey substitute. James Brains and Erin.
rolex explorer 216570 too big|rolex 216570 polar
